Over at
Throwing Sheep there's an interesting post on the role of Web 2.0 in anti-social behaviour. Unsurprisingly, given the tendency of people to respond to headlines rather that the copy, it's sparked a number of netizens to defend the utopia of user-generated-content, and interaction that is Web 2.0.
But, that's actually doing the authors a real disservice, and doesn't really address their point. They are not arguing that YouTube causes mass murders, rather that YouTube, to some extent normalises mass murders, making the unthinkable, slightly more thinkable to people who may have been on the edge in the first place. They also point out this is not a new phenomenon.
...this phenomenon is called the “Werther Effect”, after Goethe’s Sorrows of Young Werther. In Goethe’s 18th century sturm und drang novel, the melancholic hero Werther shoots himself in the head over his unrequited love for a girl called Lotte. When the book first appeared in 1774, it triggered an epidemic of similar acts of despair – the first known examples of “copycat suicides” in modern history.
Web 2.0 is not more responsible for killing sprees, than
Kurt Cobain and
Kate Moss are for glamourising drug use, than
tiny models are responsible for anorexia, than the mass media is responsible for the
early sexualisation of girls...
The word you are looking for is
cofactors people.
Somethings are too complicated to be caused by a single thing..